Finance

NVIDIA Doubled Revenue and Borrowed $25 Billion

NVIDIA's fiscal Q2 2027 revenue was $96.2 billion, and in the same quarter it issued $25 billion of notes for what the CFO Commentary calls general corporate purposes. This piece reads profit, net operating cash, the large outlays, and the commitments and guarantees separately.

2026.08.28 · By dvdmaru · ~7 min read · 1,723 words

本文另有中文版:輝達營收翻倍的這一季,發了 250 億美元的債

NVIDIA reported results for the second quarter of fiscal 2027, ended July 26, 2026, on August 26. Revenue was $96.22 billion, up 106% from a year earlier. GAAP operating income was $63.73 billion.

In the same cash-flow statement, one line had no amount in the prior quarter or the year-ago quarter: proceeds from debt issuance, $24.90 billion net. The CFO Commentary explains it in one sentence: NVIDIA issued $25.0 billion of senior unsecured notes in the quarter, for general corporate purposes.

Revenue doubled and profit is high, so why borrow? Neither the earnings release nor the CFO Commentary answers “why.” They can answer three smaller questions: how much cash operating activities netted, where cash went, and which commitments and guarantees sit behind it. Each lives on a different statement and a different date.

The income statement records business recognized this quarter. Whether the cash arrived is on another statement.

Operating activities netted $24.1 billion, less than half of last quarter

“Cash provided by operating activities” is a net figure: cash from the business, less costs and taxes paid, adjusted for changes in working capital. It is not the total customers paid this quarter, so it cannot be subtracted from revenue to find how much is still uncollected.

Operating activities netted $24.08 billion this quarter, against $50.34 billion the prior quarter and $15.37 billion a year earlier. Revenue rose 18% from the prior quarter, yet net operating cash fell by more than half. The CFO Commentary says the year-on-year rise reflects revenue growth and the sequential drop came from higher working-capital adjustments and cash taxes.

The biggest move was receivables. The change in accounts receivable reduced operating cash by $22.35 billion, against about $2.2 billion the prior quarter. Receivables ended the quarter at $63.06 billion, and days sales outstanding (DSO) rose from 45 to 60. The CFO Commentary’s reason: extended payment terms on large, multi-quarter agreements with certain investment-grade customers.

Revenue is booked first; the cash comes later. That is the company’s explanation of payment timing. It does not support a conclusion that customers cannot pay, and it does not rule out credit risk either.

Where the cash went: a few large outlays

Several outlays on the quarter’s cash-flow statement stand out:

ItemWhere on the statementThis quarter ($ billions)
Share repurchasesFinancing19.73
Dividends paidFinancing6.05
Purchases of equity securities (gross, before sales in the quarter)Investing15.82
Groq, Inc.Financing2.94
Purchases of property, equipment and intangibles (capex)Investing2.68

These lines are this piece’s selection, not an NVIDIA grouping, and not a complete cash reconciliation. The statement has other investing flows too, such as $21.78 billion of debt-securities purchases, so these lines cannot be set against the change in cash over the quarter.

For the Groq, Inc. line, the cash-flow statement gives only a name and an amount. Neither the release nor the CFO Commentary says what transaction it represents, and this piece does not guess.

$25 billion of notes: the CFO Commentary says only “general corporate purposes”

$25.0 billion is the face amount of the notes. The cash-flow line, $24.90 billion, is net of costs. As for purpose, the CFO Commentary says only “general corporate purposes.” The report does not tie the money to any of the outlays above, and this piece does not supply a reason for management.

Two tempting inferences deserve caution:

  • Large buybacks and investments in the same quarter do not show the debt was raised for any one of them, or that the company was forced to borrow.
  • Cash, cash equivalents and marketable debt securities of $56.6 billion at quarter end do not show the company had no need for financing.

What the quarter shows is that high revenue, high profit, large cash outlays and new financing coincided. The report does not say which led to which.

Commitments and guarantees: $366 billion as of July 26, and $105 billion signed in August

Beyond the cash-flow statement, the CFO Commentary lists items that have not yet become cash outlays. They carry different dates.

Future commitments. As of July 26, 2026, the CFO Commentary discloses $366 billion of total future commitments. The largest block is supply and capacity, $279 billion, up from $119 billion the prior quarter, primarily related to memory procurement, the CFO Commentary says. A separate “Additional Commitments” table lists AI cloud agreements of $36 billion and data center leases for third parties of $20 billion, $56 billion in all, not included in the $366 billion.

A commitment total, debt already recorded and cash paid this quarter are three different quantities. The $366 billion is not money already paid, and it is not necessarily all sitting in balance-sheet liabilities, so it cannot be added to or set against this quarter’s outlays. Which commitments are recorded, and how, cannot be read off a total.

Guarantees need their own look, because the largest was signed in August:

ItemMaximum exposure ($ billions)Timing
Land, power and shell guarantees for AI cloud partners’ data center lease obligations, in the event of default3.5Listed in the CFO Commentary; signing dates not specified
SB Energy guarantees (for OpenAI leases, PORTS-Pike)105.0Signed August 2026
Total108.5Includes an August post-quarter event

So $108.5 billion is not a number that was all in place at the July 26 quarter end.

According to the CFO Commentary, the August item covers SB Energy’s PORTS-Pike campus in Ohio. NVIDIA is providing credit support for the land, power and shell buildout; the campus will exclusively host NVIDIA infrastructure under 20-year leases to OpenAI, subject to limited exceptions. The guarantee obligations are capped at $105 billion and take effect in phases as conditions are met, including data centers becoming ready for service, with the first expected in fiscal 2029. Exposure declines as OpenAI pays lease amounts. The cap is not money already paid, and it is not this quarter’s spending.

Reading a report like this: which statement, then which date

Back to the opening question. Doubled revenue and new debt do not need a single story to coexist. Ask, for each number, which statement it sits on and which day it describes:

  • Revenue and operating income are income-statement figures: business recognized this quarter.
  • Operating cash, buybacks, dividends and debt proceeds are cash-flow figures: how cash moved this quarter, with operating activities shown net.
  • The $366 billion of commitments looks forward from July 26. The $108.5 billion of maximum guarantee exposure includes $105 billion signed in August.
  • For the notes, the CFO Commentary states general corporate purposes.

When you read “revenue doubled,” look next at operating cash flow and receivables. When you read “debt issued,” quote only the stated purpose. When you read “commitments” or “guarantees,” ask which date, then which kind.

Frequently asked questions

Revenue rose 18% from last quarter. Why did operating cash fall by more than half?

Operating activities netted $24.08 billion this quarter, against $50.34 billion the prior quarter. The CFO Commentary attributes the sequential drop to higher working-capital adjustments and cash taxes. Within that, days sales outstanding stretched from 45 to 60 days because of extended payment terms on large, multi-quarter agreements with certain investment-grade customers. That is the company’s explanation, not a judgment on any customer’s credit. See the section “Operating activities netted $24.1 billion, less than half of last quarter”.

Why did NVIDIA issue $25 billion of notes this quarter?

The CFO Commentary gives one sentence: the $25.0 billion of senior unsecured notes are for general corporate purposes. Neither the earnings release nor the CFO Commentary ties the money to buybacks, equity investments or any other outlay. Large outlays in the same quarter are not evidence of what the debt was for, and $56.6 billion of cash and marketable debt securities at quarter end does not show the company had no need to borrow. See the section “$25 billion of notes: the CFO Commentary says only “general corporate purposes””.

Do NVIDIA’s disclosed commitments and guarantees count as liabilities or as this quarter’s spending?

The totals in the CFO Commentary cannot settle that. The $366 billion of future commitments is as of July 26; the $108.5 billion of maximum guarantee exposure includes $105 billion signed in August, so the two have different dates. Neither total equals debt already recorded or cash paid this quarter. How each item is recorded is a question for the 10-Q notes, which this piece did not check line by line. See the section “Commitments and guarantees: $366 billion as of July 26, and $105 billion signed in August”.

Scope and version

  • Figures come from NVIDIA’s August 26, 2026 earnings release and CFO Commentary. October 16, 2026 is the editorial update date; the numbers were not refreshed and later news is not included.
  • Cash-flow figures are from the three-month column. Some prior-quarter amounts are derived by subtracting the three-month column from the six-month column and are marked “about.”
  • This piece did not check the full 10-Q notes, the note indentures or any Groq transaction documents, so it does not judge how commitments and guarantees are recorded, what the debt proceeds were used for, or the nature of the Groq payment. This is not investment advice.

Sources

Further reading: Poolside does not appear in these two documents; that deal is covered in Poolside’s Founders Say NVIDIA’s $6 Billion License Is ‘Not an Acquisition’; Regulators May See a Merger. On the power side of securing AI-cloud capacity, see a separate piece in Chinese.